PEOPLE v. EASTMAN


85 N.Y.2d 265 (1995)

648 N.E.2d 459

624 N.Y.S.2d 83

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Cecilio Eastman, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 21, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toko Serita and Philip L. Weinstein, New York City, for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney of Kings County, Brooklyn (Shulamit Rosenblum, Roseann B. MacKechnie and Monique Ferrell of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges SIMONS, TITONE, SMITH and LEVINE concur with Judge CIPARICK; Judge BELLACOSA dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion.


CIPARICK, J.

On this appeal, defendant collaterally attacks his conviction contending that it was obtained in violation of his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation as delineated in Cruz v New York (481 U.S. 186) issued by the Supreme Court after his conviction became final. In Cruz, the Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause bars the introduction of a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases