1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 279 N.J.
  5. 279 N.J. Super. 63 (1995)
 

TAYLOR v. RORKE

279 N.J. Super. 63 (1995)

652 A.2d 207

JOSEPH H. TAYLOR AND LOUISE TAYLOR, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. DANIEL RORKE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 24, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin J. Siegel, argued the cause for appellants Joseph H. Taylor and Louise Taylor (Doroshow & Pasquale, attorneys; Mr. Siegel, of counsel and on the brief).

Michael T. Novick, argued the cause for respondent Daniel Rorke (Perlow, Sebera & Pescatore, attorneys; Mr. Novick, of counsel and on the brief).

Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for Intervenor State of New Jersey (Joseph L. Yannoti, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel and Lisa R. Levine, Deputy Attorney General, on the letter brief).

Before Judges MICHELS and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Joseph H. Taylor and Louise Taylor appeal from a summary judgment of the Law Division that dismissed their personal injury tort action against defendant Daniel Rorke. Plaintiffs sought to recover non-economic losses sustained by plaintiff Joseph H. Taylor as a result of an automobile accident. The trial court dismissed the action because plaintiffs failed to satisfy the verbal threshold requirements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases