Clear and convincing evidence established that petitioner child care agency made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, including formulating a plan for the return of the child, arranging visitation and parenting classes, and contacting respondent at least once a week. The agency cannot be faulted for not arranging counseling before respondent was willing to admit he had a problem (see, Matter of Crystal Q.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF A.
216 A.D.2d 124 (1995)
629 N.Y.S.2d 206
In the Matter of Emily A., Also Known as Emily C., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Abbott House, Respondent; Jean Paul A., Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 20, 1995
June 20, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
