Defendant's challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress without a hearing is academic since the officer who recovered the property sought to be suppressed was precluded from testifying about such property pursuant to a Rosario sanction lodged against the People. Moreover, after the court's initial ruling, defendant failed to renew his motion on the grounds now asserted on appeal and, therefore, failed to preserve the issue for this Court's review (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
