The court's imposition of $7,030 for restitution to be made to the victim bank from a robbery masterminded by defendant, who was the bank's employee at the time, is neither harsh nor excessive. As defendant admitted the amount stolen from the bank the court did not need to hold a hearing simply on defendant's ability to pay (cf., People v Alonzo,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.