Evidence of three uncharged apparent narcotic transactions which took place immediately prior to the undercover's drug buy of $15 worth of cocaine was properly admitted to enable the People to prove the criminal possession with intent to sell count as charged in the indictment, and was also properly admitted as part of the factual background which allowed the officers to explain why the defendant was initially targeted as a drug seller (People v Grant,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ALEXANDER
215 A.D.2d 116 (1995)
626 N.Y.S.2d 90
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Alexander, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 2, 1995
May 2, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
