1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 141 N.J.
  5. 141 N.J. 189 (1995)
 

MATTER OF IRIZARRY

141 N.J. 189 (1995)

661 A.2d 275

IN THE MATTER OF RAMON A. IRIZARRY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 21, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Janasie, Deputy Ethics Counsel, argued the cause on behalf of Office of Attorney Ethics.

Theodore W. Daunno and Ramon A. Irizarry, pro se, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Daunno, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The District XIV Ethics Committee (DEC) charged respondent with knowing misappropriation of client funds, RPC 1.15 and 8.4(c); gross neglect, RPC 1.1(a); and lack of diligence, RPC 1.3. The Special Master recommended public discipline, and the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) recommended disbarment. We agree that the record clearly and convincingly establishes that respondent knowingly misappropriated client funds. Accordingly,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases