The court did not commit error in denying defendant a hearing on whether the People were negligent in collecting or preserving vaginal swabs in which sperm was found for DNA testing, and in prohibiting cross-examination of the People's experts with respect to DNA testing, since identity was not an issue, defendant having testified to consensual sexual contact not involving intercourse, and the complainant did not testify that defendant had ejaculated but had achieved penetration...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
