1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 216 A.D.2d
  5. 216 A.D.2d 103 (1995)
 

GROOS v. NEW YORK TEL. CO.

216 A.D.2d 103 (1995)

628 N.Y.S.2d 104

Peter Groos, Appellant, v. New York Telephone Company et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 15, 1995

The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in changing venue to Westchester County, where the cause of action arose, the majority of material witnesses work or reside, the police records are located, and plaintiff received most of his medical treatment (Toro v Gracin, 148 A.D.2d 364). Nor was the motion untimely (supra; compare, Lalka v Massafra, 167...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases