In our prior order, we found that the verdict was not based on legally insufficient evidence, nor was it against the weight of the evidence. We also found that defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied because defendant failed to preserve his claim that the People proffered insufficient medical proof that the complainant was unable to testify and because, were we to review the merits, the medical affirmation adequately supported the complainant's unavailability...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
