1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 69 F.3d
  5. 69 F.3d 209 (1995)
 

UMPLEBY v. POTTER & BRUMFIELD, INC.

No. 94-2322.

69 F.3d 209 (1995)

John W. UMPLEBY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POTTER & BRUMFIELD, INCORPORATED, a Siemens Company, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided November 3, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Kornblum, Lockyear & Kornblum, Evansville, IN, Jack N. Vanstone (argued), Evansville, IN, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jon D. Goldman, Mary Lee Franke (argued), Kahn, Dees, Donovan & Kahn, Evansville, IN, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CUDAHY, COFFEY, and MANION, Circuit Judges.

MANION, Circuit Judge.

On May 11, 1994, John Umpleby ("Umpleby") prevailed in an age discrimination suit against his former employer, Potter and Brumfield, Inc. ("P & B") in Princeton, Indiana. Because the jury was given a form of verdict that misstated the law and allowed it to render a verdict on evidence that would be insufficient to prove P & B liable under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. ("ADEA"), we reverse and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases