This case presents a unique problem created by the efforts of the trial courts to coordinate the work of the municipal and superior courts in criminal cases. Here, the same superior court judge sat as a magistrate at the preliminary examination and later as a superior court judge after the bindover and filing of an information. Apparently, confusing the statutory authority of the magistrate under Penal Code
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SILVA
Docket No. D021850.
36 Cal.App.4th 231 (1995)
43 Cal. Rptr.2d 8
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THOMAS EUGENE SILVA, JR., Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 28, 1995.
June 28, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Paul J. Pfingst, District Attorney, Thomas F. McArdle and Richard J. Sachs, Deputy District Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Robinson & Sterling and Patricia W. Robinson for Defendant and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
