1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 216 A.D.2d
  5. 216 A.D.2d 45 (1995)
 

PEOPLE v. BOLDEN

216 A.D.2d 45 (1995)

627 N.Y.S.2d 660

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Antwan Bolden, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 8, 1995

Defendant's claim that the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks during summation is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. If we were to review it, we would find that the prosecutor's comment that the police witnesses had "no motive to lie" was a fair response to the defense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases