The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion first in refusing defendant's attorney's request for an adjournment of the compliance hearing and then in denying defendant's motion to vacate the judgment on the ground of excusable default. While the judgment issued following a hearing at which defendant was unable to appear, the record confirms that he was represented by counsel throughout, and that the judgment, therefore, was not entered upon a default.
The award...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
