AESTHETIC PROP. MAINT. v. CAPITOL INDEM.

No. CV-94-0327-PR.

183 Ariz. 74 (1995)

900 P.2d 1210

AESTHETIC PROPERTY MAINTENANCE, INC., d/b/a APM Landscape, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CAPITOL INDEMNITY CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendant/Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

August 16, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones, Skelton & Hochuli by William D. Holm, Eileen J. Dennis, Phoenix, for Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc.

Jennings & Haug by William F. Haug, James L. Csontos, Phoenix, for Capitol Indem. Corp.


OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

We are asked to decide whether substantial compliance with our contractor licensing statute can satisfy the licensing prerequisite to a civil action under A.R.S. § 32-1153. We hold that it can.

I. BACKGROUND

Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. (APM) is in the landscaping business. It became a licensed contractor in January, 1990, and renewed its license in December, 1990. It had recently moved and included...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases