Because defendants had a full and fair opportunity to litigate their interpretation of a settlement agreement in a November 23, 1992 order from which they did not appeal despite being aggrieved parties, the Supreme Court properly determined that they were barred from relitigating the issue in subsequent proceedings (see, Hinchey v Sellers,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BRECHER v. MEISELMAN
216 A.D.2d 38 (1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 919
Dan Brecher, Respondent, v. David J. Meiselman et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 8, 1995
June 8, 1995
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
