TAYLOR, P.J.
This case arises from plaintiff's enforcement of its woodlands ordinance and defendants' constitutional challenge to that ordinance and its subsequently amended version. The parties recognize that both the original and the amended ordinances are at issue in this case. The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary disposition on the basis that the ordinances were unconstitutionally vague, overbroad, and lacking in definite
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.