COLUMBUS BAR ASSN. v. SCHLOSSER

Nos. 95-375 and 95-376.

74 Ohio St.3d 174 (1995)

COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. SCHLOSSER. COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION v. ELSASS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 20, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce A. Campbell, Michael J. Hardesty and Gail D. Patrick, for relator.

Messerman & Messerman Co., L.P.A., and Gerald A. Messerman; Lewis Williams and John J. Duffey, for respondent Schlosser.

Cooper, Walinski & Cramer, Cary Rodman Cooper and Richard S. Walinski; Moots, Cope & Stanton and Benson A. Wolman, for respondent Elsass.


Per Curiam.

After full review of the record, we agree with the board's findings, except for its finding of a violation of EC 5-5. The Ethical Considerations are "aspirational in character and represent the objectives toward which every member of the profession should strive. They constitute a body of principles upon which the lawyer can rely for guidance in many specific situations." Preface, Code of Professional Responsibility. The Disciplinary Rules, by contrast...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases