When defendant suggested, on cross-examination, that his possession of prerecorded buy money, consisting of a $20 bill, could be explained by the theory that he received the bill as "change" from the purported actual seller, this opened the door to evidence, with proper limiting instructions, that defendant possessed 57 additional $20 bills, since such tended to negate defendant's claim that he obtained the prerecorded bill by mere accident or happenstance (People v Molineux...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
