IN RE SHOEMAKER

No. 62169-1.

128 Wn.2d 116 (1995)

904 P.2d 1150

In the Matter of the Marriage of JOHN A. SHOEMAKER, Petitioner, and PAMELA RUSHING, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 9, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Shoemaker, pro se; and Michael W. Louden of Dancey, Cassady, & Louden, for petitioner.

The Paja Law Firm, by Marilyn G. Paja; and Cynthia D. Rosa, for respondent.


JOHNSON, J.

The trial court in this case vacated a child support order entered five years previously which modified the terms of the original dissolution decree. Under the vacated order, each parent had custody of one child and neither was obligated to pay child support. The effect of the court's decision was to reinstate the child support obligation contained in the original decree requiring the father to pay support. Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases