A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the jury's findings that defendant could have provided plaintiff with a jack that would have made the work place safe from the defect that caused the accident, and that its failure to do so was the sole proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. "The plaintiff's injury was not due to the unsafe nature of the work but to [defendant's] failure to furnish a reasonably safe place in which to perform the work." (Colello v Stevenson...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
