HILL v. JACKSON

Nos. 94-6056, 94-6083, 94-6092, 94-6276.

64 F.3d 163 (1995)

Michael Leon HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clarence L. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee. Hibbard KENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clarence L. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee. Stephen REEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clarence L. JACKSON, Defendant-Appellee. Marvin Leon GRIMM, Jr.; Tommy Crute; Dennis Witt; Robert Dame; Jimmy L. McNutt; Herbert Haymore, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Douglas Wardlaw; June A. Goodwin; Lawrence Daniels; Walter R. Coleman; Michael Leon Hill; Stephen Reedy; Hibbard Kendrick, Plaintiffs, v. Clarence L. JACKSON; Lewis W. Hurst; John A. Brown; Gail Y. Brown; Jacqueline F. Fraser, Defendants-Appellees. Donald W. Hoffman, Amicus Curiae.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided September 6, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Ira Mickenberg, Director, Appellate Advocacy Clinic, American University Washington College Of Law, Washington, DC, for appellants. Mary Elizabeth Shea, Asst. Atty. Gen., Crim. Litigation Div., Richmond, VA, for appellees. ON BRIEF: John Nadolenco, Third Year Law Student, Appellate Advocacy Clinic, American University Washington College Of Law, Washington, DC, for appellants. James S. Gilmore, III, Atty. Gen., Alan Katz, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen. & Chief, Crim. Litigation Div., Richmond, VA, for appellees. George Rutherglen, Post-Conviction Assistance Project, University Of Virginia School Of Law, Charlottesville, VA, for amicus curiae.

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by published opinion. Judge DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge MICHAEL joined.

OPINION

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge:

Several inmates brought actions to challenge the constitutionality of a Virginia parole review policy, which provides for the deferral of parole review for up to three years for certain categories of inmates. After...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases