LAWTON v. SIMPSON

93-0935-L-2; CA A80738.

891 P.2d 1371 (1995)

133 Or. App. 489

Mark LAWTON, Appellant, v. James SIMPSON and Phyliss Simpson, husband and wife, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 22, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond R. Smith, Medford, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Matthew Sutton, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Douglas J. Richmond and Kellington, Krack, Richmond & Blackhurst.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


De MUNIZ, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action for fraud, breach of contract, specific performance, conversion and constructive trust. He alleged that, in 1990, he and defendants entered into an agreement whereby defendants assisted him in obtaining refinancing for real property where plaintiff lived, that in exchange he transferred title to defendants, and that defendants agreed later to return title to plaintiff. Defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases