1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 889 P.2d
  5. 889 P.2d 1370 (1995)
 

OREGONIANS IN ACTION v. LCDC

No. CA A81525.

889 P.2d 1370 (1995)

133 Or.App. 254

OREGONIANS IN ACTION, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, and Deschutes County, Respondents, Alliance for Responsible Land Use in Deschutes County, 1000 Friends of Oregon, and Howard Paine, Respondents below.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy S. Cofield, Tigard, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was David B. Smith.

Stephanie L. Striffler, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

No appearance for respondent Deschutes County.

Before RIGGS, P.J., RICHARDSON, C.J., and LEESON, J.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Oregonians in Action seeks review of LCDC's periodic review order for Deschutes County. In its first assignment, petitioner contends that LCDC erred by refusing to consider certain objections advanced by petitioner, on the ground that petitioner had not presented the corresponding issues to the county specifically enough to satisfy former ORS 197.643(3)(c) and OAR 660-19-080(3)(c). Petitioner maintains that LCDC wrongly imported the assertedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases