1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 107 Md.
  5. 107 Md. App. 114 (1995)
 

OSTEOIMPLANT TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. RATHE PRODUCTIONS, INC.

No. 848, September Term, 1995.

107 Md. App. 114 (1995)

OSTEOIMPLANT TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. RATHE PRODUCTIONS, INC.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

November 6, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David F. Albright (Albright, Brown & Caudill, LLC, on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellant.

Max H. Lauten (Kramon & Graham, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellee.

Argued Before DAVIS and HOLLANDER, JJ., and PAUL E. ALPERT, Associate Judge of the Court of Special Appeals (retired), Specially Assigned.

PAUL E. ALPERT, Judge, Ret., Specially Assigned.

In this appeal we are called upon to decide whether a foreign judgment, when recorded in Maryland, is then subject to post judgment revision proceedings under the Maryland Rules.

All parties involved agree that appellant, Osteoimplant Technology Inc., hired appellee, Rathe Productions Inc., multiple times in the early 1990's to build exhibits for the purpose of demonstrating appellant's wares at trade shows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases