1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 878 F.Supp.
  5. 878 F.Supp. 1324 (1995)
 

WILSON v. U.S.

Nos. C 95-20042 JW, C 94-20860 JW.

878 F.Supp. 1324 (1995)

Pete WILSON, Governor of the State of California; State of California, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America; Janet Reno, Attorney General; Trevor Potter, Chairman, Federal Elections Commission; Federal Elections Commission, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

March 2, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Rubin, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area, San Francisco, CA.

Mark D. Rosenbaum, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

Alan L. Schlosser, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, San Francisco, CA.

Kathryn K. Imahara, Asian Pacific American Legal Center of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

William R. Tamayo, Asian Law Caucus, Inc., San Francisco, CA.

Joaquin G. Avila, Voting Rights Atty., Milpitas, CA.

Harry Bremond, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA.

David H. Raizman, Western Law Center for Disability Rights, Los Angeles, CA.

Elaine B. Feingold, Disability Rights and Education Defense Fund, Inc., Berkeley, CA.

Cyrus J. Rickards, Office of the Atty. Gen., Sacramento, CA.

Pete Wilson, Governor of the State of California, Sacramento, CA.

Bill Jones, Secretary of State, Sacramento, CA.

Brenda Premo, Dept. of Rehabilitation, Sacramento, CA.

Frank Zolin, Dept. of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento, CA.

Eloise Anderson, Dept. of Social Services, Sacramento, CA.

Holly Lee Wiseman, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Voting Section, Washington, DC.

Lawrence E. Noble, Federal Elections Com'n, Washington, DC.

Michael J. Yamaguchi, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, CA.

INJUNCTION ORDERING THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND GOVERNOR PETE WILSON TO COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL VOTER REGISTRATION ACT OF 1993

WARE, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action questions whether the National Voter Registration Act, an otherwise laudable attempt by Congress to promote nondiscriminatory voter registration standards, is nevertheless unconstitutional because it invades powers reserved to the states.

The United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases