1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 898 F.Supp.
  5. 898 F.Supp. 1302 (1995)
 

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE v. MADISON CTY.

No. IP 95-0682-C H/G.

898 F.Supp. 1302 (1995)

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. MADISON COUNTY DRAINAGE BOARD, Stephen E. Randolph, Gene Best, Doug Drake, Jeff Purdue, Ted Waymire, Emley J. Hallgrath, Patrick Manship, Bradley A. Rayl Surveying and Engineering, and Van Horn Excavating, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

September 18, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Withrow, Henderson Daily Withrow & Devoe Indianapolis, Indiana, for plaintiff.

William J. Norton, Anderson, Indiana, for defendants.

Dennis F. McCrosson, Stilwell, McCrosson & Life, Indianapolis, Indiana for intervenor Jane Morehead.

Nancy L. Gettinger, Office of the Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana for amicus curiae State of Indiana.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF

HAMILTON, District Judge.

This case concerns the ditches of Madison County, Indiana. It pits the interests of farmers who need to drain their land against the interests of a pipeline company whose underground pipelines run through the needed drainage ditch. Plaintiff Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company ("Panhandle") brought this action against the Madison...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases