KING v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT

92-12157; CA A82403.

889 P.2d 1310 (1995)

133 Or.App. 179

In the Matter of the Compensation of James M. King, Claimant. James M. KING, Petitioner, v. BUILDING SUPPLY DISCOUNT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Gilbertson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Steve Cotton, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


De MUNIZ, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board determining that he has failed to establish the compensability of his coronary artery disease.

Claimant has had two compensable heart attacks. When he had his first heart attack in 1977, doctors also diagnosed coronary artery disease. Claimant had coronary bypass surgery, which apparently was not treated as a part of the compensable claim. In holding that the 1977 heart attack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases