GUARDADO v. J.R. SIMPLOT CO.

H93-045; CA A83592.

902 P.2d 1225 (1995)

137 Or. App. 95

In the Matter of the Order Denying Further Reconsideration of Ramira U. Guardado, Claimant. Ramira U. GUARDADO, Petitioner, v. J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, Respondent, Department of Consumer and Business Services, Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Welch, Bruun, Green & Wollheim, Portland, and J. David Kryger and Emmons, Kropp, Kryger, Albany.

Kenneth L. Kleinsmith, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Meyers, Radler, Replogle & Bohy.

Stephen L. Madkour, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for intervenor. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before RIGGS, P.J. and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services, contending that the Director erred in refusing to allow her to file a request for reconsideration of a determination order of the Workers' Compensation Division. We reverse.

The facts are not disputed. Claimant was compensably injured in August 1991. Her claim was closed by determination order on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases