1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 902 P.2d
  5. 902 P.2d 1220 (1995)
 

ESTEY v. MacKENZIE ENGINEERING

9212-08572; CA A82218.

902 P.2d 1220 (1995)

137 Or. App. 1

Richard Craig ESTEY, an individual, Appellant, v. MacKENZIE ENGINEERING INCORPORATED, an Oregon corporation; and Leonard Krombein, an individual, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 27, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Guy A. Randles, Eric A. Grasberger and Stoel Rives Boley Jones & Grey.

Karen O'Kasey, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief were Richard J. Kuhn and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendants MacKenzie Engineering, Inc. (MEI) and Leonard Krombein, an employee of MEI, alleging negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract. The trial court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment based on a limitation of liability clause in the parties' contract for professional services. We affirm.

Plaintiff contracted with MEI for a "limited visual review" of a house...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases