1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 884 F.Supp.
  5. 884 F.Supp. 1218 (1995)
 

U.S. v. REAL ESTATE 2030 E. MONROE, SPRINGFIELD

No. 93-3167.

884 F.Supp. 1218 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE PARCEL OF REAL ESTATE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2030 EAST MONROE STREET, SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS, With All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereon, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division.

May 9, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Esteban F. Sanchez, Asst. U.S. Atty., Springfield, IL, for plaintiff.

Joseph S. Miller, Springfield, IL, for defendant.

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:

Civil Forfeiture.

The claimant says she is an innocent owner.

The facts say she is not an owner at all.

At bench trial, the government sought to forfeit the defendant property as being purchased with the proceeds of drug sales and for being used to facilitate drug transactions. 21 U.S.C. §§ 881(a)(6) and 881(a)(7). The claimant said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases