1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 894 F.Supp.
  5. 894 F.Supp. 1190 (1995)
 

DORR-OLIVER INC. v. FLUID-QUIP, INC.

No. 93 C 0842.

894 F.Supp. 1190 (1995)

DORR-OLIVER INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. FLUID-QUIP, INC., Andrew Franko, and Pic Tek, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

August 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Terry Rifkin, Mary Spaulding Burns, Rockey, Rifkin and Ryther, Chicago, IL, John P. Luther, Andrew L. Tiajoloff, Alfred H. Hemingway, Jr., Edward P. Kelly, John E. Lynch, Felfe & Lynch, New York City, for Dorr-Oliver Inc.

Thomas W. Flynn, Thomas & Buckley, Chicago, IL, Bruce E. Peacock, Thomas W. Flynn, Matthew R. Jenkins, Biebel & French, Dayton, OH, Patricia Susan Smart, John Bostjancich, Smart & Bostjancich, Chicago, IL, for Fluid-Quip Inc., Andrew Franko, Pic Tek Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

I. Introduction1

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

This is a case about corn, clams, copying and confusion. The story begins decades ago, when plaintiff Dorr-Oliver Incorporated ("Dorr-Oliver")2 invented a new way to process corn using centrifugal force. Prior to these inventions, the corn wet milling industry separated the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases