COMPUTER CONCEPTS, INC. v. BRANDT

A8612-07746; CA A74597.

905 P.2d 1177 (1995)

137 Or. App. 572

COMPUTER CONCEPTS, INC., Profit Sharing Plan; and Computer Concepts, Inc., Pension Plan, succeeded in interest by Don Weidenweber, Self-Directed Individual Retirement Account, by and through its custodian, Piper Jaffray & Hopwood, Incorporated, Respondents, v. William D. BRANDT, Marc McDevitt and Cynthia L. Barrett, Personal Representative of the Estate of Peter C. Murphy, Sr., aka Peter Connacher Murphy, Deceased, Appellants, and McDevitt & Company Investment Corporation, Paragon, Inc., an Oregon corporation; American Insurance Company, and John Does 1-6, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 15, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Don G. Carter, Portland, argued the cause for appellant William D. Brandt. With him on the briefs were Janice M. Stewart, Jonathan M. Radmacher and McEwen, Gisvold, Rankin & Stewart.

David R. Nepom, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant Marc McDevitt.

John R. Faust, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellant Cynthia L. Barrett. With him on the briefs was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt.

Richard S. Yugler and Robert J. McGaughey, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With them on the brief were Law Office of Richard S. Yugler and McGaughey & Georgeff.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Defendants Brandt, McDevitt and Peter Murphy, Sr. (Murphy),1 appearing separately, appeal from the judgments against them in this action under the Oregon Securities Law, ORS chapter 59, and the Oregon Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (ORICO). ORS 166.715 to 166.735. We reverse in part as to Murphy, and affirm in all other respects.

In a previous appeal, the Oregon Supreme Court reversed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases