UTILITY REFORM PROJECT v. ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL

SC S41778 (Control), SC S41779.

905 P.2d 1154 (1995)

322 Or. 333

UTILITY REFORM PROJECT, v. ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL, Portland General Electric Company, and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Respondents. DON'T WASTE OREGON COUNCIL and Colleen O'Neil, Petitioner, v. ENERGY FACILITY SITING COUNCIL, Portland General Electric Company, and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided November 24, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners Don't Waste Oregon Council and Colleen O'Neil. With him on the brief was Linda K. Williams, Portland.

Linda K. Williams, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner Utility Reform Project. With her on the brief was Daniel W. Meek, Portland.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents Energy Facility Siting Council and Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. With him on the response were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

J. Jeffrey Dudley, Portland, argued the cause and filed the response for respondent Portland General Electric Company.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS and DURHAM, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Affirmed by an equally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases