WINE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS' RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD

No. 94-AA-727.

675 A.2d 1381 (1995)

Roy E. WINE, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA POLICE AND FIREFIGHTERS' RETIREMENT AND RELIEF BOARD, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 24, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederic W. Schwartz, Jr. and James Taglieri, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Sonia Bacchus, Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Garland Pinkston, Acting Corporation Counsel, Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, and Lutz Alexander Prager, Assistant Deputy Corporation Counsel, were on the brief for respondent.

Before FERREN and KING, Associate Judges, and NEWMAN, Senior Judge.


NEWMAN, Senior Judge:

Wine argues that the decision of the Board ordering his involuntary retirement based on non-service related disability lacks the requisite evidentiary support. We affirm.

The proceedings of the Board are set forth in its brief; we incorporate the same herein. On this record, there is sufficient evidence to support the Board's holding that there was not a full time light duty job petitioner was capable of performing. Thus, based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases