ROONEY v. KULONGOSKI

No. SC S41985, S41999.

902 P.2d 1143 (1995)

322 Or. 15

Daniel A. ROONEY and Julie Davis, Petitioners, v. Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. Lon T. MABON, Petitioner, v. Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and Daniel A. Rooney and Julie Davis, Intervenors.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided September 28, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Hinkle, ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Inc., Portland, argued the cause and filed the petition, for petitioners Daniel A. Rooney and Julie Davis.

Lawrence J. Hall, Silverton, argued the cause and filed the petition, for petitioner Lon T. Mabon.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the responses, for respondent. With him on the responses were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.


GILLETTE, Justice.

This is a ballot title proceeding consolidating two petitions that challenge the Attorney General's certified ballot title for a proposed initiative measure that has been designated as "Elections Division # 13" by the Secretary of State's office. Petitioner Lon T. Mabon is a chief petitioner for the measure. He submitted timely written comments to the Secretary of State concerning the draft ballot title and thereby preserved the right to reiterate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases