DURHAM, Justice:
This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for an extraordinary writ. Petitioner complains that at his original parole hearing, the Board of Pardons violated his due process rights by setting a twenty-year review date (in essence failing to set a fixed date) and by considering "false" testimony from the victim's family that he did not have an opportunity to rebut.
The parole hearing in question occurred in 1989. At that time, a direct appeal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
