1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 655 A.2d
  5. 655 A.2d 1245 (1995)
 

LAROCHELLE v. CREST SHOE CO.

655 A.2d 1245 (1995)

Georgette LAROCHELLE v. CREST SHOE COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. and Hanover Insurance Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided March 9, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Macri (orally), Berman & Simmons, Lewiston, for employee.

John Chapman (orally), Kelly & Chapman and John King, Norman, Hanson & Detroy, Portland, for employer.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, GLASSMAN, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA and LIPEZ, JJ.

RUDMAN, Justice.

Crest Shoe Company (Crest) and its workers' compensation insurers, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) and Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover) appeal from decisions of the Appellate Division and the Workers' Compensation Commission. Because we conclude that the phrase "pending appeal" in 39 M.R.S.A. § 104-A(1) (1989) refers to a period beginning with the notice of appeal, and does not include the prior pendency of a motion for findings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases