PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his conviction and sentence for carrying a concealed firearm. He asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the physical evidence against him. We agree and reverse.
The encounter between the police and appellant cannot be considered to be a consensual encounter in light of the restrictions placed on appellant's freedom to leave. Popple v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.