WINTONBURY GROUP v. ROANTREE

(13429)

39 Conn. App. 149 (1995)

THE WINTONBURY GROUP v. MAE ROANTREE

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released September 5, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward M. Rosenthal, with whom, on the brief, was Samuel B. Feldman, for the appellant (defendant).

Kent D. Mawhinney, with whom, on the brief, was John S. Pinney, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Dupont, C. J., and Schaller and Spear, JS.


SCHALLER, J.

The defendant appeals from the order of the trial court granting the plaintiff a supplemental prejudgment remedy pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278a et seq. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly found that No. 93-431 of the 1993 Public Acts (P.A. 93-431) did not apply retroactively to this case. We dismiss the appeal for lack of a final judgment.

As a preliminary matter, we must discuss the defendant's apparent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases