UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff,
v.
Emanuel LACY, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, N.D. California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 18, 1995.
August 18, 1995.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
William Weiner, William Weiner Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Gerome Lacy aka Red.
Frank Z. Leidman, Frank Z. Leidman Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Lamarr Lacy.
Judd C. Iversen, Judd C. Iversen Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Goldie Lacy.
Garrick S. Lew, Sol Wollock, Minami Lew & Tamaki, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Anthony Perry aka A.P. aka Tony.
Stuart Hanlon, Tony Tamburello, Tamburello Hanlon & Waggener, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Gordon Henderson, aka Big Hen aka Hendu.
James W. Ramsaur, Chapuis & Ramsaur, Oakland, CA, for defendant Marvin Hardeman.
Paul B. Meltzer, Meltzer Leeming, Santa Cruz, CA, for defendant Henry Scott aka Red.
Martin R. Sabelli, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Francisco, CA, for defendant James Henry Davis aka Poncho.
Steve Emery Teich, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Luis Cornelio Orozco.
Christopher Cannon, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Jose Luis Padilla-Ozuna.
Arthur Pirelli, Arthur Pirelli Law Offices, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Emmitt Granville.
Gail Shifman, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Willie Young.
George C. Boisseau, Santa Rosa, CA, for defendant Damien Drew Rivers.
Barry L. Morris, Oakland, CA, for defendant Maurice Herring.
Peter Goodman, San Francisco, CA, for defendant Lavirrisse Jones.
Jeffrey S. Niesen, Kenneth H. Wine, Niesen & Associates, Sausalito, CA, for defendant Mary Cross.
John J. Jordan, U.S. Attorney's Office, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff U.S.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
In anticipation of pretrial evidentiary hearings in this matter,1 defendants filed a motion for a ruling that the Assistant United States Attorney ("AUSA") himself must review the personnel files of federal agents called to testify at those hearings. By bench order at a motion hearing held on June 28, 1995, the court denied defendants' request. After further sua sponte review of
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
