ESHELMAN, T.J., J., January 3, 1995.
Plaintiff has appealed from our order entered November 28, 1994, in the above-captioned matter which terminated the case due to inactivity pursuant to B.R.C.P. 1901 and Pa.R.J.A. 1901. This opinion is in support of our order pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. § 1925.
In the case sub judice, there has been no docket activity from the time the complaint was filed on August 4, 1992, until notice of termination was served by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
