PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges his convictions for two counts of sexual battery, alleging the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss based on the destruction of evidence. We affirm his convictions since we find no error in the court's ruling on this issue, but we strike two special conditions of probation that were not orally pronounced at sentencing.
Pursuant to this court's opinion in Fitts v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.