STATE EX REL. SMITH v. FROST

No. 95-1707.

74 Ohio St.3d 107 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. SMITH ET AL. v. FROST, JUDGE, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 22, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Duke W. Thomas and Bruce L. Ingram, for relators.

Robert L. Becker, Licking County Prosecuting Attorney, and Scott A. Anderson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondents Judge Frost and Licking County Board of Commissioners.

Downes & Hurst and Rufus B. Hurst, for intervening respondent village of Granville.


Per Curiam.

As a preliminary matter, the village has filed a motion to intervene. The village claims that it is entitled to intervene as of right under Civ.R. 24(A)(2), because it possesses "an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action and [it] is so situated that the disposition of the action may as a practical matter impair or impede [its] ability to protect that interest" and the village's interest is not "adequately...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases