1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 656 A.2d
  5. 656 A.2d 1157 (1995)
 

V.P. v. L.S.

No. 93-FS-1640.

656 A.2d 1157 (1995)

V.P., Appellant, v. L.S., Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided April 13, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth Figueroa, for appellant.

Edward Schwab, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Erias Hyman, Acting Corp. Counsel, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before SCHWELB and FARRELL, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.

PRYOR, Senior Judge:

This case presents the novel issue of whether V.P. is entitled to reimbursement for child support paid between a 1982 order recognizing paternity and ordering child support, and a 1993 order vacating the determination of paternity. The trial court determined that V.P. was not entitled to reimbursement because Super. Ct.Civ.R. 60(b) provides the court with no authority to issue such an order. We agree, and therefore, affirm.

In 1982, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases