1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 58 F.3d
  5. 58 F.3d 121 (1995)
 

ARTHUR v. E.I. DUPONT de NEMOURS & CO.

No. 94-1007.

58 F.3d 121 (1995)

Constance E. ARTHUR; Delmer Arthur, her husband; Nathaniel Arthur, an infant child, by his natural mother and next friend, Constance E. Arthur, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. E.I. DUPONT de NEMOURS & CO., INC., a Delaware company, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 30, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: David Stephen Skeen, Law Offices of David S. Skeen, South Charleston, WV, for appellants. David Besserer Thomas, Spilman, Thomas & Battle, Charleston, WV, for appellee. ON BRIEF: William E. Murray, Charleston, WV, for appellants. Eric M. James, Brett J. Preston, Spilman, Thomas & Battle, Charleston, WV, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MICHAEL wrote the opinion, in which Judge HAMILTON and Senior Judge PHILLIPS joined.

OPINION

MICHAEL, Circuit Judge:

In this intentional tort action, which comes to federal court by removal, Constance E. Arthur and her husband and son sue her former employer, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont). The Arthurs appeal orders of the district court denying their motion to remand under 28 U.S.C. § 1445...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases