IN RE MARRIAGE OF FINK

No. 4-94-0836.

656 N.E.2d 1131 (1995)

275 Ill.App.3d 960

212 Ill.Dec. 297

In re the MARRIAGE OF H. Catherine FINK, n/k/a H. Catherine Tyler, Petitioner-Appellee, and Jim Michael Fink, Respondent-Appellant.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Fourth District.

Decided October 19, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman J. Fombelle, Kent A. Rathbun (argued), Burger, Fombelle, Zachry & Rathbun, P.C., Decatur, for Jim Michael Fink.

John W. Foltz (argued), Glasgow & Foltz, P.C., Monticello, for H. Catherine Fink.

James E. Ryan, Attorney General State of Illinois, Chicago, Barbara A. Preiner, Solicitor General, Chicago, Susan Frederick Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General, Chicago, for Atty. Gen. James E. Ryan.


Justice COOK delivered the opinion of the court:

Respondent's union is on strike. He filed a petition to reduce his child support obligation because of his reduction in income. The trial court did reduce the amount of his current child support payments but ruled that the reduced amount would have to be repaid at a later date. Respondent appeals that part of the order. We affirm.

Petitioner H. Catherine Fink and respondent Jim Michael Fink were granted a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases