PREMIER TECHNOLOGY v. OR. STATE LOTTERY

92C-10520; CA A83481.

901 P.2d 883 (1995)

136 Or. App. 124

PREMIER TECHNOLOGY, an Illinois general partnership, Appellant, v. STATE of Oregon, By and Through the OREGON STATE LOTTERY, Respondent, and Video Lottery Consultants, Inc., Intervenor below.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 23, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John F. McGrory, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Timothy R. Volpert and Davis Wright Tremaine.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


WARREN, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment dismissing plaintiff's claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It assigns error to the trial court's granting of defendant's motion for summary judgment, ORCP 47, and to its denial of plaintiff's motion to compel defendant's production of certain documents. ORCP 46. We reverse.

On February 3, 1992, plaintiff and defendant executed a document entitled "Video Lottery Terminal Lease Agreement." It provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases