1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 72 Ohio
  5. 72 Ohio St.3d 104 (1995)
 

STATE EX REL. OSBORNE v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 93-2366.

72 Ohio St.3d 104 (1995)

THE STATE EX REL. OSBORNE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 26, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond J. Tisone & Associates and Raymond J. Tisone, for appellant.

Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Diane M. Meftah, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Letson, Griffith, Woodall & Lavelle Co., L.P.A., Lynn B. Griffith III and Edward L. Lavelle, for appellee General Motors Corporation.

Per Curiam.

R.C. 4123.57(B) establishes a compensation schedule for claimants who sustain the "loss" of an enumerated body part. "Loss" is not confined to amputation. A "total and permanent loss of use" also constitutes a compensable "loss." State ex rel. Walker v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 58 Ohio St.2d 402, 12 O.O.3d 347, 390 N.E.2d 1190, syllabus. Claimant argues that ankylosis, as a matter of law, constitutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases