1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 70 F.3d
  5. 70 F.3d 106 (1995)
 

PIERCE v. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

No. 95-3301.

70 F.3d 106 (1995)

Daniel B. PIERCE, Petitioner, v. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 16, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Douglas Foster, Neves & Crowther, Galveston, Texas, argued for petitioner.

Nuriye C. Uygur, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, David M. Cohen, Director and Kirk T. Manhardt, Assistant Director. Also on the brief was Thomas Kelly, Government Printing Office, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, of counsel.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Daniel B. Pierce petitions for review of the January 20, 1995 final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket No. DA0752940508-I-1, 66 M.S.P.R. 281, dismissing his appeal for lack of jurisdiction.* Because the board addressed the merits of Pierce's appeal and did not err in doing so, we affirm, but on the merits.

BACKGROUND

The Government Printing Office (agency) appointed Pierce to the position...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases